Gender Disparity in Completing School Education in India over Regions
Abstract
Is gender disparity in education greater in North India? This paper seeks to answer this question by examining gender differences in probability of completing school education across regions in India. A Gender Disparity Index is calculated using National Sample Survey Organization unit level data from the 61st Round and regional variations in this index analyzed to examine the hypothesis that gender disparity is greater in the North, comparative to the rest of India. This is followed by an econometric exercise using a logit model to confirm the results of the descriptive analysis after controlling for socio-economic correlates of completing school education.
Finally, the Fairlie decomposition method is used to estimate the contribution of explanatory variables in explaining differences in probabilities of completing schooling across regions. The results reveal that gender disparities are greater in North India, for total and rural population, and in Eastern India, for urban population.
However, the ‘residual effect’ after accounting for effect of explanatory variables - often referred to as ‘discrimination effect’, as opposed to disparity – is higher in Eastern India, irrespective of the place of residence.
References
[2] Agrawal, S.P., and Aggarwal, J.C. 1994. Third Historical Survey of Educational Development in India: Select Documents, 1990-1992. Concept Publishing Company.
[3] Akhtar, S. 1996. Do Girls Have a Higher School Drop-out Rate than Boys? A Hazard Rate Analysis of Evidence from a Third World City. Urban Studies 33(1): 49-62.
[4] Bandopadhyay, M., and Subrahmanian, R. 2010. Gender Equity in Education: A Study of Trends and Factors. Research Monograph No. 18. National University of Education and Planning.
[5] Bardhan, P.K. 1974. On life and death questions. Economic and Political Weekly 9: 32-34.
[6] Basu, A.M. 1992. Culture, the Status of Women, and Demographic Behaviour: Illustrated with the Case of India. Oxford University Press.
[7] Bauer, T.K., and Sinning, M. 2008. An Extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition to Non-Linear Models. Advances in Statistical Analysis 92: 197-206.
[8] Blinder, A.S. 1973. Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates. Journal of Human Resources, 8: 436-55.
[9] Boissiere, M. 2004. Determinants of Primary Education Outcomes in Developing Countries. Background paper for evaluation of the World Bank’s support to primary education. The World Bank.
[10] Brown, P.H., and Park, A. 2002. Education and Poverty in Rural China. Economics of Education Review 21(6): 523-41.
[11] Burney, N.A., and Irfan, M. 1991. Parental Characteristics, Supply of Schools, and Child School Enrolment in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review 30(1): 21-62.
[12] Connelly, R., and Zheng, Z. 2003. Determinants of School Enrolment and Completion of 10-18 Year Olds in China. Economics of Education Review 22(4): 379-88.
[13] Cotton, J. 1988. On the Decomposition of Wage-Differentials. The Review of Economics and Statistics 70: 236-43.
[14] Das, S., and Mukherjee, D. 2007. Role of Women in Schooling and Child Labour Decision: The Case of Urban Boys in India. Social Indicators Research 82(3): 463-86.
[15] Das, S., and Mukherjee, D. 2008. Role of Parental Education in Schooling and Child Labour Decision: Urban India in the Last Decade. Social Indicators Research 89(2): 305-322.
[16] Das Gupta, M., Lee, S., Uberoi, P., Wang, D., and Zhang, X. 2004. State policies and women's agency in China, the Republic of Korea, and India 1950-2000: Lessons from contrasting experiences. In V. Rao & M. Walton (Eds.), Culture and Public Action (pp. 234-259). Stanford University Press.
[17] Deolalikar, A. 1997. The Determinants of Primary School Enrolment and Household School Expenditures in Kenya: Do They Vary by Income? Mimeograph. Department of Economics, University of Washington.
[18] Desai, S., and Kulkarni, V. 2008. Changing Educational Inequalities in India in the Context of Affirmative Action. Demography 45(2): 245-270.
[19] Dyson, T., and Moore, M. 1983. On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review 9(1): 35-60.
[20] Fairlie, R.W. 2005. An extension of the Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition Technique to Logit and Probit Models. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 30: 305-16.
[21] GOI (Government of India). 2006. Social, Economic and Educational Backwardness of Muslims in India: A Report, Report of the Prime Minister’s High Level Committee. Government of India.
[22] Hadden, K., and London, B. 1996. Educating Girls in the Third World: The Demographic, Basic Needs, and Economic Benefits. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 37: 1-2.
[23] Hasan, R., and Mehta, A. 2006. Under-representation of Disadvantaged Classes in Colleges: What Do the Data Tell Us. Economic and Political Weekly September: 3791-3796.
[24] Husain, Z., and Sarkar, S. 2010. Gender Disparities in Educational trajectories in India: Do Girls Become More Robust at Higher levels? Social Indicators Research, forthcoming. DOI 10.1007/s11205-010-9633-4.
[25] Husain, Z., and Chatterjee, A. 2009. Primary Completion Rates across Socio-religious Communities in India. Economic and Political Weekly XLIV(15): 59-67.
[26] Jejeebhoy, S.J. 2001. Women's autonomy in rural India: Its dimensions, determinants, and the influence of context. In H. B. Presser & G. Sen (Eds.), Women's Empowerment and Demographic Processes: Moving Beyond Cairo (pp. 205-238). Oxford University Press.
[27] Jeffrey, R. 1993. Politics, Women and Well-Being: How Kerala Became ‘A Model’. Oxford University Press.
[28] Kingdon, G.G. 2002. The Gender Gap in Educational Attainment in India: How much can be explained. Journal of Development Studies 39(2): 25-53.
[29] Kundu, A., and Rao, J.M. 1986. Inequity in educational development: Issues in measurement, changing structure and its socio-economic correlated with special reference to India. In Raza, M. (Ed.), Educational planning: A long term perspective (pp. 435–466). NIEPA and Concept Publishing Company.
[30] Miller, B.D. 1981. The Endangered Sex: Neglect of Female Children in Rural North India. Cornell University Press.
[31] Murthi, M., Guio, A.C., and Dreze, J. 1995. Mortality, fertility, and gender bias in India: A district-level analysis. Population and Development Review 21(4): 745- 782.
[32] Planning Commission, Government of India. 2002. National Human Development Report. Oxford University Press.
[33] Neumark, D. 1988. Employers’ Discriminatory Behaviour and the Estimation of Wage Discrimination. Journal of Human Resources 23: 279-95.
[34] Oaxaca, R.L. 1973. Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labour Markets. International Economic Review 14: 693-709.
[35] Oaxaca, R.L., and Ransom, M. 1994. On Discrimination and the Decomposition of Wage Differentials. Journal of Econometrics 61: 5-21.
[36] Okumu, I.M., Nakajjo, A., and Isoke, D. 2008. Socioeconomic Determinants of Primary School Dropout: The Logistic Model Analysis. Munich Personal RePec Archive, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/view/ people/Okumu,_Ibrahim_M=2E.html, Accessed 20 November 2008.
[37] Rahman, L., and Rao, V. 2004. The Determinants of Gender Equity in India: Examining Dyson and Moore's Thesis with New Data. Population and Development Review 30(2): 239-268.
[38] Raju, S. 1991. Gender and Deprivation. A Theme Revisited with a Geographical Perspective. Economic and Political Weekly 26(49): 2827-39.
[39] Reimers, C. 1983. Labour Market Discrimination against Hispanic and Black Men. The Review of Economics and Statistics 65: 570-79.
[40] Rosenzweig, M.R., and Schultz, T.P. 1982. Market opportunities, genetic endowments, and intrafamily resource distribution: Child survival in rural India. American Economic Review 72(4): 803-815.
[41] Schultz, T.W. 1961. Investment in Human Capital. The American Economic Review 51(1): 1-17.
[42] Shariff, A. 1999. Indian Human Development Report. Oxford University Press.
[43] Schultz, T.P. 1993. Investments in the Schooling and Health of Women and Men. The Journal of Human Resources 28(4): 689-734.
[44] Sen, A. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities. North Holland.
[45] Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Knopf.
[46] Sengupta, P., and Guha, J. 2002. Enrolment, Dropout and Grade Completion of Girl Children in West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly 37(17): 1621-1637.
[47] Sinning M., Hahn, M., and Bauer, T.K. 2008. The Blinder-Oaxaca Decomposition for Non-Linear Regression Models. The Stata Journal 8(4): 490-492.
[48] Strategic Information Section and Division of Policy and Planning (SIS/DPP). 2005. Levels, Trends and Determinants of Primary School Participation and Gender Parity. UNICEF.
[49] Sopher, D.E. 1980. Sex disparity in Indian literacy. In D. E. Sopher (Ed.), An exploration of India: Geographical perspectives on society and culture (pp. 130–188). Cornell Press.
[50] Sundaram, K. 2006. On backwardness and fair access to higher education. Economic and Political Weekly 41(50): 5173-5182.
[51] Thorat, S. 2004. Higher Education in India: Emerging Issues Related to Access, Inclusiveness and Equity. Nehru Memorial Lecture, University of Mumbai, Mumbai.
[52] Tansel, A. 1998. Differences in School Attainments of Boys and Girls in Turkey, Discussion Paper 789, Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.