Access to Education under U.S. Law and Some Recommendations for Vietnam



Purpose: The right to education is a fundamental right for all members of society, serving as a cornerstone for promoting population growth and facilitating equal educational opportunities without discrimination. Vietnam, a nation committed to fulfilling its international obligations, including ensuring access to education as a fundamental constitutional right, is not without its challenges. These challenges, ranging from inadequate infrastructure to social and economic disparities, present opportunities for growth and improvement. This article examines the legal framework and implementation of education access laws in the United States, with the aim of identifying strategies that can be selectively adopted to enhance Vietnam's education system. By doing so, Vietnam can create a supportive legal environment for innovation in education and training, paving the way for a brighter future.

Methodology: The study involves a comparative analysis of the education systems in Vietnam and the United States, focusing on the legal provisions and practical implementations that facilitate access to education.

Findings: The analysis reveals that, despite Vietnam's commitment to ensuring education as a fundamental constitutional right, the country faces challenges such as inadequate infrastructure and social and economic disparities. These challenges present opportunities for improvement through the adoption of best practices from the U.S. education system.

Originality: This research provides a unique perspective by highlighting the potential for Vietnam to enhance its education system through the selective adoption of strategies from the U.S. legal and educational framework. This approach aims to create a supportive legal environment for innovation in education and training, contributing to a brighter future for Vietnam.



[1] Bødker, S. and M. Kyng (2018). Participatory Design that Matters—Facing the Big Issues. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 25(1): 4:1-4:31. DOI: 10.1145/3152421.
[2] Czaja S. J. and C. C. Lee (2007). The impact of aging on access to technology. Univers. Access Inf. Soc., 5(4): 341–349. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-006-0060-x
[3] F. of H. I.- FHI, “Future of Humanity Institute,” The Future of Humanity Institute. Available at:
[4] Hilbert, M. (2011). Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women in developing countries? A typical case of lies, damned lies, and statistics. Womens Stud. Int. Forum, 34(6): 479–489. DOI: 10.1016/j.wsif.2011.07.001
[5] Holm, S. (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5th edn.: Beauchamp T L, Childress J F. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-514332-9. J. Med. Ethics, 28(5): 332–332. DOI: 10.1136/jme.28.5.332-a
[6] Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). The Challenge of Reforming Nutritional Epidemiologic Research. JAMA, 320, no. 10, pp. 969–970. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.11025
[7] Irani, L., J. Vertesi, P. Dourish, K. Philip, and R. E. Grinter (2010). Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, in CHI ’10. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Apr. 2010, pp. 1311–1320. DOI:10.1145/1753326.1753522
[8] Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the Vulnerable. SAGE Publications, Ltd. DOI: 10.4135/9781849209861
[9] Lungu M. (2023). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Am. J. Qual. Res. Available at:
[10] Norris, P. (2023). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide, Cambridge Core. Available at:
[11] Piper, A. M., R. Campbell, and J. D. Hollan (2010). Exploring the accessibility and appeal of surface computing for older adult health care support, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, in CHI ’10. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 907–916. DOI: 10.1145/1753326.1753461
[12] Rose, M. L., A. M. Raymer, L. E. Lanyon, and M. C. Attard (2013). “A systematic review of gesture treatments for post-stroke aphasia,” in Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): Quality-assessed Reviews [Internet], Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK). Available at:
[13] Shi, S., L. Zhang, and G. Wang (2023). Bridging the Digital Divide: Internet Use of Older People from the Perspective of Peer Effects. Sustainability, 15(15). Art. no. 15. DOI: 10.3390/su151512024
[14] Story, M. F., J. L. Mueller, and R. L. Mace (1998). The Universal Design File: Designing for People of All Ages and Abilities. Revised Edition,” Center for Universal Design, NC State University. Available at:
[15], Thông tư 32/2020/TT-BGDĐT Điều lệ trường trung học cơ sở trường trung học phổ thông mới nhất, THƯ VIỆN PHÁP LUẬT. Available at:
[16] Walsh, M. (2022). What Do ‘Parents’ Rights’ Mean Legally for Schools, Anyway?, Education Week. Available at:
[17] Wyche S. P. and L. L. Murphy (2012). Dead China-make’ phones off the grid: investigating and designing for mobile phone use in rural Africa, Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Newcastle Upon Tyne United Kingdom: ACM, pp. 186–195. DOI: 10.1145/2317956.2317985
[18] 2 School Finance Litigation in the Name of Educational Equity: Its Evolution, Impact, and Future | Equity and Adequacy in Education Finance: Issues and Perspectives | The National Academies Press. Available at:
[19] Ask the Expert: What Does the Constitution Say About Education? Nothing Explicitly, But That Doesn’t Mean it Can’t Help Provide Students with Equal Educational Access, Says Assistant Professor Jenn Ayscue | College of Education News. Available at:
[20] Convention against Discrimination in Education, UNESCO. Available at:
[21] Education 2030: Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong learning for all – UNESCO IITE. Available at:
[22] Education Is a Fundamental Human Right and the Priority of the 21st Century, Education Cannot Wait. Available at:
[23] Florida Parental Rights in Education Act,” Wikipedia. Available at:
[24] Human Rights for the Twenty-first Century (Chapter 11) - Global Governance and the Emergence of Global Institutions for the 21st Century. Available at:
[25] Keep families closer with GrandPad. Available at:
[26] Links Between Democracy, Development, Human Rights Stressed in Third Committee | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases. Available at:
[27] Lynne Rienner Publishers | Disability and the Internet Confronting a Digital Divide. Available at:
[28] MOET functions and tasks. Available at:
[29] NCLB and IDEA: What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know and Do | LD OnLine. Available at:
[30] Right to education: scope and implementation; General comment 13 on the right to education, Art. 13 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights - UNESCO Digital Library. Available at:
[31] Technology and Social Inclusion, MIT Press. Available at:
[32] The 14th Amendment Protects the Right to a Public Education. Available at:
[33] The 2013 Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Available at:
[34] To focus on starting the formation of the Law on Teachers to ensure progress and quality in Vietnam. Available at:
[35] Understanding education as a right,” Right to Education Initiative. Available at:
[36] Universal Declaration of Human Rights, United Nations. Available at:
How to Cite
TRINH, Duy Thuyen; NGUYEN, Truong Thanh Hai; MAI, Pham Bao Tran. Access to Education under U.S. Law and Some Recommendations for Vietnam. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, [S.l.], v. 15, n. 1, p. 34-44, june 2024. ISSN 2068-8407. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 20 july 2024. doi: