The Dynamics of Knowledge in Portugal – The Role Played by Public Institutions

  • Margarida Chagas LOPES University of Lisbon


The process of knowledge development in Portugal has progressed at very different speeds in function of the economic outlook and the alternation of political power. The main driving and regulatory forces have been greatly conditioned by domestic and international restrictions. In this framework, public institutions during the previous social-democratic Government and above all the Portuguese Agency for Science and Technology, have greatly contributed to the backlash in the previous favourable evolution which had been characterizing the evolution of knowledge development since the first decade of 2000.This has led to instability and the discontinuity of the framework of public policy, which has been faced with two kinds of fundamental problems: a series of structural blocks which have proved difficult to eradicate, and the lack of a true knowledge strategy.

Author Biography

Margarida Chagas LOPES, University of Lisbon
Research Center in Economic and Organizational Sociology (SOCIUS)


[1] Apple, M. 2014. Official Knowledge: Democratic Education in a Conservative Age (3rd. Revised edition). N. Y: Routledge.
[2] Barro, Robert J. 1988. Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. NBER papers (
[3] Chagas Lopes, M. 2011. Education, Vocational Training and R&D: Towards New Forms of Labour Market Regulation. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 0(1):16-31.
[4] Chagas Lopes, M. 2014. The Development of Knowledge in Portugal: a Slow and Unsustainable Progress. The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, XII, 3: 42-60.
[5] DGEEC. 2014. Principais Resultados do CIS 2012- Inquérito Comunitário à Inovação.
[6] Etzkowitz, H., and Leydesdorff, L. 1995. The Triple Helix -- University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 14(1): 14-19 (file:///C:/Users/MARGARIDA/Downloads/SSRN-id2480085.pdf).
[7] EU. 2015. Innovation Union Scoreboard 2015. Available at:
[8] EUROSTAT – DGEEC.2015.Community Innovation Survey (CIS).
[9] FCT. 2016. Projectos de I&D. Available at: (
[10] Hanushek, E. A., and Woessmann, L. 2012. Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes and causation. Journal of Economic Growth, Vol 17, Issue 4:267-321.
[11] Kovács, I., and Chagas Lopes, M. 2010. Employment and Sustainable Development: Education, Training and R&D in the Regulation of the Labour Market. MPRA paper 24931. Munich: University Library Available at: (
[12] Leydesdorff, L. 2013. The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention and Entrepreneurship: 1844-1851.
[13] OECD. 2015. OECD Science, Technology and Industry. Scoreboard 2015. Available at: (
[14] PORDATA DATABASE. 2016. Available at:
[15] Romer, P. M. 1994.The origins of endogenous growth. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (1): 3-22.
How to Cite
LOPES, Margarida Chagas. The Dynamics of Knowledge in Portugal – The Role Played by Public Institutions. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 9, p. 20-29, nov. 2016. ISSN 2068-8407. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 26 may 2024.


knowledge development; Portugal; political alternation; public institutions; regulation.