The Cost of Maintaining a Currency Board: The Case of Bulgaria
Abstract
We investigate the cost of maintaining a currency board regime in Bulgaria by using two sources of monetary policy shocks. We further compare the results of two identification strategies. Following Corsetti, Duarte and Mann (2018), we use a one-year German bond yield in a recursive VAR to determine its effect on output, prices and consumption. Next, we use changes in IY EONIA rate around ECB policy announcements as a monetary shock that potentially captures more information and test it with local projections on output, prices and consumption. We repeat the tests for Germany and Spain and find that all three countries yield different results with the two instruments and identifications. Our conclusion is that the currency board is performing well, and Bulgaria is well financially integrated within the EU.
References
[2]. BNB (2015). Ordinance No. 21 of 26 November 2015 on Minimum Required Reserves Maintained with the Bulgarian National Bank by Banks.
[3]. Brugnolini, L. (2018). About Local Projection Impulse Response Function Reliability. CEIS Working Paper No. 440.
[4]. Canova F. (1995). The Economics of VAR Models. In: Hoover K.D. (eds) Macroeconometrics. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol. 46. Springer, Dordrecht.
[5]. Christiano, L. J, Eichenbaum, M., Evans, C. (1999). What Have We Learned and To What End? In: Handbook of Macroeconomics, ed. Michael Woodford and John D. Taylor.
[6]. Cochrane, J. and Piazzesi, M. (2002). The Fed and Interest Rates- A High Frequency Identification. American Economic Review, 92(2): 90-95.
[7]. Cook, T. and Hahn, T. (1989). The Effect of Changes in the Federal Funds Rate Target on Market Interest Rates in the 1970s. Journal of Monetary Economics, 24: 331-351.
[8]. Corsetti, G., Duarte, B. and Mann, S. (2018). One money, many markets: a factor model approach to monetary policy in the Euro Area with high-frequency identification. CFM Discussion Paper Series (CFM-DP2018-05). Centre For Macroeconomic. London, UK.
[9]. Crowe, C., Barakchian, S. (2010). Monetary Policy Matters: New Evidence Based on a New Shock Measure (October 2010). IMF Working Papers, Vol., pp. 1-65.
[10]. Erdinc, D. (2017). Monetary Transmission Bank Lending. NP.
[11]. Evans, C. and Kuttner, K.N. (1998). Can VARs Describe Monetary Policy. Research Papers, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, No. 9812, pp. 1-48.
[12]. Faust, J., Swanson E., Wright, J. (2004). Identifying VARs based on high frequency futures data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 51(6), pp. 1107–113.
[13]. Favero, C., Bagliano, F. C. (1997). Measuring Monetary Policy with VAR Models: An Evaluation. CEPR Discussion Paper Series No. 1743.
[14]. Gerlach, S., Smets, F. (1995). The Monetary Transmission Mechanism: Evidence from the G-7 Countries. BIS Working Paper No. 26.
[15]. Gertler, M., Karadi, P. (2015). Monetary Policy Surprises, Credit Costs, and Economic Activity. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 7(1). 44–76.
[16]. Gulde, A. (1999): The Role of the Currency Board in Bulgaria’s Stabilization. Finance and Development, 35, 4.
[17]. Gürkaynak, S., Sack, B., Swanson, E. (2005). The Sensitivity of Long-Term Interest Rates to Economic News: Evidence and Implications for Macroeconomic Models. American Economic Review, 95(1), pp. 425-436.
[18]. Hanke, S.H., Schuler, K. (1999). A Monetary Constitution for Argentina: Rules for Dollarization. Cato Journal, 18.3, 405–19.
[19]. Hanson, S. and Stein, J.C. (2012). Monetary policy and long-term real rates. Finance and Economics Discussion Series (FEDS). Federal Reserve Board Discussion Paper.
[20]. Haug, A. and Christie S. (2007). Local linear impulse responses for a small open economy. Working Papers 0707. University of Otago. Department of Economics.
[21]. Ialnazov, D. and Nenovsky, N. (2002). The Currency Board and Bulgaria’s Accession to the European Monetary Union NBER Working Paper 7395.
[22]. Jansen, E. (2016). Monetary policy shocks of the ECB: The effects on Norwegian asset prices and yield curve. University of Oslo, Department of Economics. NP.
[23]. Jordà, Ò. (2005). Estimation and Inference of Impulse Responses by Local Projections. American Economic Review 95 (1). pp. 161-82.
[24]. Kerssenfischer, M. (2019). Information effects of euro area monetary policy: New evidence from high-frequency futures data. Discussion Papers. Deutsche Bundes bank.
[25]. Kilian, L. and Kim, Y.J. (2011). How Reliable Are Local Projection Estimators of Impulse Responses? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, issue 4, p. 1460-1466.
[26]. Kuttner, K. N. (2001). Monetary policy surprises and interest rates: Evidence from the Fed funds futures market. Journal of Monetary Economics: 47(3), pp. 523–544.
[27]. Lucas, R. Jr, (1976). Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, 1(1), pp. 19-46.
[28]. Mertens, K. and Ravn, M. (2013). The Dynamic Effects of Personal and Corporate Income Tax Changes in the United States. American Economic Review, 103(4), pp. 1212-47.
[29]. Mccallum, B. (1999). Analysis of the Monetary Transmission Mechanism: Methodological Issues. NBER Working Paper 7395.
[30]. Miller, J. B. (2001). The Bulgarian Currency Board. Comparative Economic Studies, 53-74.
[31]. Minea, A. and Rault, C. (2009): Some new insights into currency boards: evidence from Bulgaria. Journal of Economic Integration, 24.3, pp.563-595.
[32]. Minea, A. and Rault, C. (2011). External Monetary Shocks and Monetary Integration: Evidence from the Bulgarian Currency Board, IZA Discussion Papers 5797, Institute of Labor Economics.
[33]. Miranda-Agrippino, S. and Ricco, G. (2017). The Transmission of Monetary Policy Shocks. Bank of England Working Paper 657.
[34]. Nakamura, E. and Steinsson, J. (2013). High Frequency Identification of Monetary Non-Neutrality: The Information Effect. NBER Working Paper 19260.
[35]. Nenovsky, N. and Hristov, K. (2002). The New Currency Boards and Discretion: Empirical Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD Economic Survey of Bulgaria.
[36]. Pazardjiev, M., Vasilev, A. (2004). Specificities of the Monetary Transmission Mechanism within the Bulgarian Currency Board Framework: The First Five Years. Research Report, EconStor Direct
[37]. Pikkani, R. (2000). The Monetary Sector under a Currency Board Arrangement: Specification and Estimation of a Model with Estonian Data. BOFIT 10.
[38]. Plagborg-Møller, M. and Wolf, C. (2019). Local Projections and VARs Estimate the Same Impulse Responses. Working Paper, n.p.
[39]. Ramey V. (2016). Macroeconomic Shocks and Their Propagation. NBER Working Papers 21978, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[40]. Romer, C. and Romer, D. (2000). Federal Reserve Information and the Behavior of Interest Rates. American Economic Review, 90 (3), pp. 429-457.
[41]. Rudebusch, G. (1998). Do Measures of Monetary Policy in a VAR Make Sense? International Economic Review, 39(4). Symposium on Forecasting and Empirical Methods in Macroeconomics and Finance, pp. 907-931.
[42]. Sims, C. A. (1980): Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica, 48, pp. 1-48.
[43]. Sims, C. A. (1992). Interpreting the macroeconomic time series facts: The effects of monetary policy. European Economic Review, 36(5), pp. 975-1000.
[44]. Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W. (2001). Vector Autoregressions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (4), pp. 101-115.
[45]. Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W. (2017). Twenty Years of Time Series Econometrics in Ten Pictures. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31 (2), pp. 59-86.
[46]. Vetlov, I. (2003). Monetary transmission mechanism in Lithuania. NP.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.