The mercantile dilemma: formalisations and historical conclusions
The following contributions are hereby worked: one mathematically formalises Mundell’s Impossible trio and Rodrik’s Globalisation paradox, supplying the latter with a taxonomy in terms of the current account; by means of Kaldor’s price endogeneity in output, one proves that external real money market disparity and trade generate external output mismatches and lead to autarky unless offset, using topology and dynamical systems; one characterises transfers and federalism and shows that all unitary states are federal polities and can merge into confederations; one demonstrates that the said external output mismatches can be only eluded via autarky or neutral- isation, irrespective of federalism; one discerns (i) artificial currency areas guaranteeing inter-regional external output growth equality and (ii) modern protectionism as two Nash equilibria, to wit, the mercantile dilemma, especially rationalising the nexus between the Gold standard, the Industrial revolution and the Great divergence therethrough.
 Bordo M. and James H. (2013) “The European crisis in the context of the history of previous financial crises", Journal of macroeconomics.
 Israel J. (1997) “England's mercantilist response to Dutch world trade primacy, 1647-74", Conflicts of empires: Spain, the Low Countries and the struggle for world supremacy (1585-1713), Bloomsbury.
 Kaldor N. (1970) “The case for regional policies", Scottish journal of political economy.
 Keynes J. M. (1980) “The collected writings", Volume 25: activities, 1940-44: shaping the post-war world: the Clearing union, Cambridge university press.
 Krugman P. (1979) “Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade", Journal of international economics.
 Meade J. (1957) “The balance of payments problems of a European free trade area", Economic journal.
 Mélitz M. (2003) “The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity", Econometrica.
 Mundell R. (1963) “Capital mobility and stabilization policy under fixed and flexible exchange rates", Canadian journal of economics.
 Nash J. (1950) “Equilibrium points in n-person games", Proceedings of the national academy of sciences.
 Padoa-Schioppa T. (1988) “The European monetary system: a long-term view", Cambridge university press.
 Palley T. (2017) “The fallacy of the globalization trilemma: reframing the political economy of globalization and implications for democracy", FMM working paper.
 Rodrik D. (2011) “The globalization paradox: democracy and the future of the world economy", William Warder Norton and company.
 Rey H. (2015) “Dilemma not trilemma: the global financial cycle and monetary policy independence", NBER working paper.
 Serra A. (1613) “Breve trattato delle cause che possono far abbondare li regni d'oro e d'argento dove non sono miniere", G. G. Destefanis (1803).
 Thirlwall A. (2014) “Kaldor's 1970 regional growth model revisited", Scottish journal of political economy.
 Thirlwall A. (2002) “The nature of economic growth", Edward Elgar publishing.
 Verdoorn P. J. (1949) “Fattori che regolano lo sviluppo della produttività del lavoro", L'industria.
The Copyright Transfer Form to ASERS Publishing (The Publisher)
This form refers to the manuscript, which an author(s) was accepted for publication and was signed by all the authors.
The undersigned Author(s) of the above-mentioned Paper here transfer any and all copyright-rights in and to The Paper to The Publisher. The Author(s) warrants that The Paper is based on their original work and that the undersigned has the power and authority to make and execute this assignment. It is the author's responsibility to obtain written permission to quote material that has been previously published in any form. The Publisher recognizes the retained rights noted below and grants to the above authors and employers for whom the work performed royalty-free permission to reuse their materials below. Authors may reuse all or portions of the above Paper in other works, excepting the publication of the paper in the same form. Authors may reproduce or authorize others to reproduce the above Paper for the Author's personal use or for internal company use, provided that the source and The Publisher copyright notice are mentioned, that the copies are not used in any way that implies The Publisher endorsement of a product or service of an employer, and that the copies are not offered for sale as such. Authors are permitted to grant third party requests for reprinting, republishing or other types of reuse. The Authors may make limited distribution of all or portions of the above Paper prior to publication if they inform The Publisher of the nature and extent of such limited distribution prior there to. Authors retain all proprietary rights in any process, procedure, or article of manufacture described in The Paper. This agreement becomes null and void if and only if the above paper is not accepted and published by The Publisher, or is with drawn by the author(s) before acceptance by the Publisher.