Applying Methods of Estimating Indefiniteness Conditions in the Context of Ensuring Economic Safety of Regions

  • Anna Viktorovna ORLOVA Belgorod National Research University, Belgorod
  • Julia Vladimirovna LYSHCHIKOVA Belgorod National Research University, Belgorod

Abstract

High level of indefiniteness and the crisis nature of the current economic system cause external and internal threats that have an essential impact on the social and economic development of regions. It makes people pay close attention to the issues related to servicing and managing their economic safety. The goal of this research is to stipulate and develop tools on estimating the comprehensive territorial force. The authors formulated a system of particular indicators of the expert estimation of the territory development under conditions of indefiniteness in the context of the process related to taking decisions on ensuring their economic safety. The content of the comprehensive territorial force and the parameters of the process related to the social and economic state of regions were defined during the research. The results of the research can be used to reveal peculiarities of the territorial force and to define areas of building mechanisms on ensuring economic safety of regions.

References

[1] Aktualnyie reytingi regionov Rossii [Actual Ratings of Russian Regions]. (2015). www.regcomment.ru/investigations/aktualnye-reytingi-regionov-rossii. (accessed 01.04.2016).
[2] Allen, J.H. 2005. Shifting Perspective to Achieve and Sustain Enterprise Security. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/abstracts/news-atsei/securitymatters20053.cfm (accessed 01.04.2016).
[3] Allen, J.H. 2002. Information Survivability: Required Shifts in Perspective. http://www.hill.af.mil (accessed 01.04.2016).
[4] Arhipov, A.B. 2013. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost: otsenki, problemyi, sposobyi obespecheniya [Economic Safety: Estimates, Problems, and Methods to Provide]. Issues of Economy, 9: 236.
[5] Arrow, K.J. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing. Helsinki: Yrjö Jahnssonin Säätiö, pp. 61.
[6] Bernardo, A.E., and Chowdhry, B. 2002. Resources, Real Options, and Corporate Strategy. Journal of Financial Economics, 63 (2): 211-234.
[7] Bessil, J. 2004. Risk-management in Banking. New York: John Wiley Inc., pp. 821.
[8] Buzan, B., Wæver, O. and Wilde, J. 1998. Security: a New Framework for Analyses. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp. 239.
[9] Davis, A.G., and Newman, A.M. 2008. Modern Strategic Mine Planning. CRC Mining Conference Paper. www.inside.mines.edu. (accessed 30.11.2016)
[10] Deighton-Smith, R., and Jacobs, S. 1997. RIA: Best Practices in OECD Countries. Available at: www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/35258828.pdf (accessed 25.10.2016).
[11] Dobrovidov, A.V., Koshkin, G.M., and Vasiliev, V.A. 2012. Non-parametric Models and Statistical Inference from Dependent Observations. USA: Kendrick Press, pp. 512.
[12] Equator Principles. Available at: www.equator-principles.com. (accessed 01.03.2016).
[13] Generalnyiy reyting privlekatelnosti gorodskoy sredyi prozhivaniya (obitaniya) po itogam deyatelnosti za 2013 god [General Rating of Attractiveness of Urban Habitat Accoridng to results of the Activity for 2013]. (2015). Available at: http://www.xn-----flclaefgadgbl2ccdgivqface04a.xn--p1ai (accessed 01.03.2016).
[14] Glaziev, S.Yu. 2007. O zadachah strukturnoy politiki v usloviyah globalnyih tehnologicheskih sdvigov [On Tasks of Structural Policy in the Context of Global Technological Shifts]. Economic Science of Modern Russia, 3 (38): 49-61.
[15] Gutman, G.V., and Illarionov, A.E. 2003. Strategiya razvitiya municipaliteta [Municipality Development Strategy]. Moscow: YURKNIGA, pp. 256.
[16] Integralnyiy reyting sta krupneyshih gorodov Rossii [Integral Rating of One Hundred of Russian Largest Cities]. (2015). urbanica.spb.ru. (accessed 01.03.2016).
[17] Leipzig Charter on Sustainable European Cities. Available at: ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/themes/urban/leipzig_charter.pdf (accessed 01.03.2016).
[18] McKinsey USI. 2013. Available at: www.mckinseychina.com/wpcontent/uploads/2014/04/china-urban-sustainability-index-2013.pdf (accessed 01.04.2016).
[19] Mikulskiy, K. 2016. Sistemnyie riski rossiyskogo obschestva [System Risks of the Russian Society]. Society and Economy, 1: 4–7.
[20] Nashe obschee buduschee. Doklad Vsemirnoy komissii po voprosam okruzhayuschey sredyi i razvitiya [Our Common Future. Report of the Global Committee on Issues Related to Environment and Development]. (1987). Available at: www.un.org/ru/ga/pdf/brundtland.pdf. (accessed 01.03.2016)
[21] Oleynikov, V.R. (2001). Ekonomicheskaya i natsionalnaya bezopasnost [Economic and National Safety]. Saint-Petersburg: Finances, pp: 759.
[22] Orlova, A.V., Nikulina, Y.V., Chistnikova, I.V., and Lyshchikova, J.V. 2015. Assessment of Capitalization as a Management Tool of Economic Development of a Region. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (3): 93-98.
[23] Primakin, A.I., and Bolshakova, L.V. 2012. Metod ekspertnyih otsenok v reshenii zadach obespecheniya ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti hozyaystvuyuschego subjekta [Method of expert Estimates When Solving Tasks Related to Ensuring Economic Safety of Economic Entity]. Bulletin of the Saint-Petersburg University of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs, 1 (53): 191-200.
[24] Pratt, J.W. 1964. Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large. Econometrica (The Econometric Society), 32 (1-2): 122-136.
[25] Rezultaty analiza oprosa ekspertov po voprosam sovershenstvovaniya metodiki reytinga ustoychivogo razvitiya gorodov RF [Results of Analyzing Experts’ Enquiry on Issues Related to Improving Methodology of the Rating of Stable Development of Russian Cities]. 2016. Date Views 5.11.2016 Available at: agencysgm.com/projects/Opros_experts.pdf (accessed 05.11.2016).
[26] Schoemaker, P.J.H.. 1982. The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and limitations. Jоurnаl оf Eсоnоmiс Litеrаturе, XX (2): 529-563.
[27] Spear, J., and Williams, P. 2012. Security and Development in Global Politics: A Critical Comparison. Washington: George-town University Press, pp. 352.
[28] Staschen, S., Dermish, A., and Gidvani, L. 2012. Regulatory Impact Assessment Methodology: Towards Evidence Based Policy. Making in Financial Inclusion. Bankable Frontier Associates. Available at: bankablefrontier.com/wp-content/uploads/documents/Regulatory-Impact-Assessment_BFA-Concept-Note.pdf (accessed 05.11.2016).
[29] Valinurova, L.S., Evtushenko, E.V., Iskhakova, E.I., and Kazakova, M.V. 2013. Otsenka effektivnosti razvitiya regionalnyih sotsialno-ekonomicheskih sistem [Estimation of Efficiency of Regional and Economic Systems Development]. Ufa: BAGSU, pp. 84.
[30] United National Global Compact. Available at: www.unglobalcompact.org/Languages/russian/index.html. (accessed 01.03.2016).
Published
2017-08-20
How to Cite
ORLOVA, Anna Viktorovna; LYSHCHIKOVA, Julia Vladimirovna. Applying Methods of Estimating Indefiniteness Conditions in the Context of Ensuring Economic Safety of Regions. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 2, p. 511 - 519, aug. 2017. ISSN 2068-696X. Available at: <https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/1331>. Date accessed: 20 apr. 2024.